Repurposing Anthelmintic Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment: AComprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on Ivermectin and Mebendazole

dc.contributor.authorSatyam, Shakta Mani
dc.contributor.authorEl-Tanani, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorPatni, MohamedAnas
dc.contributor.authorRehman, Abdul
dc.contributor.authorWali, Adil Farooq
dc.contributor.authorRangraze, Imran Rashid
dc.contributor.authorBabiker, Rasha
dc.contributor.authorRabbani, Syed Arman
dc.contributor.authorEl-Tanani, Yahia
dc.contributor.authorRizzo, Manfredi
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-16T16:38:29Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the urgent exploration of therapeutic options, including drug repurposing. Anthelmintic drugs such as ivermectin and mebendazole have garnered interest due to their potential antiviral and immunomod ulatory properties. However, conflicting evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) necessitates a comprehensive meta-analysis to determine their efficacy and safety in COVID 19 management. Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the clinical efficacy of ivermectin and mebendazole in treating COVID-19 by analyzing their impact on viral clearance, symptom resolution, hospitalization duration, and safety profiles. Methods: A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify RCTs published up to February 2025. Eligible studies in cluded adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 who received ivermectin or mebendazole compared with a placebo or standard of care. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Statistical heterogeneity was eval uated using the I2 statistic, and pooled effect sizes were calculated for primary clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty-three RCTs (n = 12,345) were included, with twenty-one studies on ivermectin and two on mebendazole. The pooled analysis suggested no statistically significant improvement in viral clearance (p = 0.39), hospitalization duration (p = 0.15), or symptom resolution (p = 0.08) with ivermectin or mebendazole. However, individual stud ies indicated potential benefits, particularly for mebendazole, in reducing viral load and inflammation. Both drugs exhibited favorable safety profiles, with no significant increase in adverse events. Conclusions: The promising propensities observed in selected studies underscore the potential of ivermectin and mebendazole as adjunct therapies for COVID-19. With well-established safety profiles, immunomodulatory effects, and affordability, these drugs present strong candidates for further exploration. Advancing research through well-designed, large-scale RCTs will help unlock their full therapeutic potential and expand treatment options in the fight against COVID-19.
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nu.edu.sd/handle/nusu/134
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAntibiotics
dc.subjectCOVID-19 antiviral therapy
dc.subjectrepurposed drugs for COVID-19
dc.subjectivermectin and mebendazole efficacy
dc.subjectrandomized clinical trials meta-analysis
dc.subjecthost-directed therapy for COVID-19
dc.titleRepurposing Anthelmintic Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment: AComprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on Ivermectin and Mebendazole
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
antibiotics-14-00459.pdf
Size:
2.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
antibiotics-14-00459.pdf
Size:
2.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections

© 2002–2025 National University – Sudan (NUSU). All rights reserved.